The System of Financial Control in the Management of a Small Business Enterprise: Methods and Tools of Implementation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Small businesses in any country remain an essential link in maintaining the level of competition. Thus, it remains relevant to consider the possibilities of small business development in the economy of any state. This work focuses on the financial and managerial components of such enterprises in Ukraine. The purpose of the study is to assess the methods of financial control and management of small business enterprises in Ukraine, as well as to consider the features of small business development in Ukraine and the Kharkiv region in particular. The primary method for writing the paper was the method of analysis, given a large number of different types of data processed by the authors. During the writing of the work, it was concluded that in Ukraine, financial control in small enterprises plays a unique role in the possibility of further functioning of the enterprise. This is due to a significant number of problems in the country's economy, as well as difficulties that exist in doing business. In work, two models were built that characterize the methods of conducting financial control in the management of the enterprise: column-shaped and spiral-shaped. In addition, the work analyzes the international experience of studying financial control systems in small business companies, which once again confirms the role of financial control in improving their financial results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.022 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".