MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4328007212 · doi:10.7202/1097185ar

« Le singe hors de sa cage » : Mazurier-Jocko au théâtre de la Porte Saint-Martin

2023· article· fr· W4328007212 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ignacio Ramos-Gay

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes littéraires · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article se propose d’analyser l’interprétation de Charles-François Mazurier du primate protagoniste de la pièce Jocko, ou le singe du Brésil, de Gabriel Lurieu et Edmond Rochefort (1825), au théâtre de la Porte Saint-Martin de Paris. À partir des chroniques de l’époque, nous entreprendrons l’étude de la transgression du « quatrième mur » que fit l’acteur par le biais de ses acrobaties : ce dernier agissait tel un singe en liberté, bondissant de l’avant-scène aux loges, se promenant à quatre pattes sur le balcon, interagissant directement avec son public, ou dérobant leurs objets personnels. Nous éluciderons donc la transformation sémiotique et symbolique de la salle qu’engendrent ces manoeuvres. Devenu une ménagerie improvisée, le théâtre de la Porte Saint-Martin permit aux spectateurs d’entrer en contact avec un animal exotique incarné par un homme, dont le jeu rend compte des discours scientifiques et populaires du premier tiers du dix-neuvième siècle sur la nature sauvage des quadrumanes, et des tentatives de l’humain pour les maîtriser.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes littérairesSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207