La grille transculturelle de la Clinique pédiatrique transculturelle de l’Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont comme outil d’évaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La diversité culturelle de la population montréalaise a amené les professionnels de la Clinique pédiatrique transculturelle de l’Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont à inscrire un outil de travail expérimenté depuis une vingtaine d’années dans leur méthodologie d’évaluation. L’élaboration de cette grille d’évaluation transculturelle s’appuie sur plusieurs fondements théoriques et méthodologiques de l’ethnopsychiatrie. Elle constitue un guide pour aider l’intervenant à identifier et à tenir compte des éléments du parcours migratoire et des impacts du changement dans les repères culturels. Elle permet aussi d’accorder une place au sens donné par l’usager à ses difficultés selon ses croyances, son point de vue personnel et culturel. La diffusion plus large de cette grille pourrait enrichir l’évaluation du fonctionnement social des travailleurs sociaux auprès des personnes issues de la diversité ethnoculturelle en accordant une plus grande place aux éléments culturels et migratoires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.043 | 0.042 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".