MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4328023759 · doi:10.7202/1097402ar

Présentation

2023· article· fr· W4328023759 on OpenAlexaff
Josée Grenier, Josée Chénard, Diane Tapp, Audrey-Anne Dumais-Michaud

Bibliographic record

VenueIntervention · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)Michel-SarrazinUniversité LavalUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. L'article 26 de la Loi concernant les soins de fin de vie indique que la personne doit respecter les critres suivants pour formuler une demande d'AMM : Elle est une personne assure au sens de la Loi sur l'assurance maladie; Elle est majeure et apte consentir aux soins; Elle est en fin de vie; Elle est atteinte d'une maladie grave et incurable; Sa situation mdicale se caractrise par un dclin avanc et irrversible de ses capacits; Elle prouve des souffrances physiques ou psychiques constantes, insupportables et qui ne peuvent tre apaises dans des conditions qu'elle juge tolrables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventionSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207