Application of RBV theory in entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capability and customer relationship management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research in the field of marketing management with RBV Theory in improving business performance at river tourism objects. Entrepreneurial orientation and dynamic capability become independent variables with customer relationship management as mediation in improving business performance. Research analysis with SEM-PLS on 350 river customers in Kereng Bangkirai, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. The research results show that entrepreneurial orientation is not directly significant to business performance, while customer relationship management is significant. Dynamic result ability is not significant to business performance and significant to customer relationship management. These results can be an introduction that business performance is very important with the role of entrepreneurial orientation and dynamic capabilities with customer relationship management mediation. Result implications can increase business capabilities with entrepreneurial oriented business strategies, dynamic capabilities and customer relationship management in improving business performance. In further research can consider market sensing capability as mediation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it