MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4328030233 · doi:10.59030/jpmbd.v1i1.13

PENCEGAHAN DAN PENATALAKSANAAN GASTRITIS DI POSYANDU LESTARI II DI KELURAHAN TANJUNG RAYA KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG

2022· article· id· W4328030233 on OpenAlexaff
Wijonarko

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gastritis merupakan masalah terbesar di seluruh dunia, sekitar 1,7 milyar kasus terdapat di negara yang sedang berkembang. Gastritis di Indonesia mencapai 40,8% di beberapa daerah dengan prevalensi 274.396 kasus dari 238.452.952 jiwa penduduk dan termasuk sepuluh penyakit terbanyak yang masuk rawat inap, termasuk di Provinsi Bandar Lampung. Puskesmas Satelit mengalami peningkatan sejak 3 tahun terakhir dari tahun 2015-2017 yaitu 13% (1.650 kasus), 15% (1.979 kasus), 17% (1.867 kasus). Salah satu penyebab peningkatan adalah kurangnya pengetahuan, sehingga perlu dilakukan edukasi kesehatan secara tatap muka. Pengabdian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan masyarakat tentang gastritis di wilayah Posyandu Lestari II Wilayah Puskesmas Satelit Kota Bandar Lampung. Pengabdian ini di laksanakan tanggal 18 Agustus 2022. Hasil Pengabdian ini terdapat peningkatan pengetahuan masyarakat tentang pengetahuan dan pencegahan Gastritis. Kesimpulan, pemberian edukasi kesehatan berpengaruh terhadap pengetahuan masyarakat tentang penyakit Gastritis agar masyarakat dapat terhindar dari penyakit tersebut. Kata Kunci: gastritis, pengetahuan, edukasi kesehatan

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Pengabdian MasyarakatSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207