Quantifying the drug response of patient-derived organoid clusters by aggregated morphological indicators with multi-parameters based on optical coherence tomography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) serve as excellent tools for personalized drug screening to predict clinical outcomes of cancer treatment. However, current methods for efficient quantification of drug response are limited. Herein, we develop a method for label-free, continuous tracking imaging and quantitative analysis of drug efficacy using PDOs. A self-developed optical coherence tomography (OCT) system was used to monitor the morphological changes of PDOs within 6 days of drug administration. OCT image acquisition was performed every 24 h. An analytical method for organoid segmentation and morphological quantification was developed based on a deep learning network (EGO-Net) to simultaneously analyze multiple morphological organoid parameters under the drug's effect. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) testing was conducted on the last day of drug treatment. Finally, a corresponding aggregated morphological indicator (AMI) was established using principal component analysis (PCA) based on the correlation analysis between OCT morphological quantification and ATP testing. Determining the AMI of organoids allowed quantitative evaluation of the PDOs responses to gradient concentrations and combinations of drugs. Results showed that there was a strong correlation (correlation coefficient >90%) between the results using the AMI of organoids and those from ATP testing, which is the standard test used for bioactivity measurement. Compared with single-time-point morphological parameters, the introduction of time-dependent morphological parameters can reflect drug efficacy with improved accuracy. Additionally, the AMI of organoids was found to improve the efficiency of 5-fluorouracil(5FU) against tumor cells by allowing the determination of the optimum concentration, and the discrepancies in response among different PDOs using the same drug combinations could also be measured. Collectively, the AMI established by OCT system combined with PCA could quantify the multidimensional morphological changes of organoids under the drug's effect, providing a simple and efficient tool for drug screening in PDOs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".