MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4328052449 · doi:10.1159/000530185

The Outcomes of Maternal Immune Activation Induced with the Viral Mimetic Poly I:C on Microglia in Exposed Rodent Offspring

2023· review· en· W4328052449 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Neuroscience · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of TorontoUniversité LavalUniversity of Victoria
FundersFundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBranch Out Neurological FoundationConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsSynaptic pruningMicrogliaOffspringImmune systemNeurosciencePregnancyImmunologyBiologyNeurochemicalNeuroinflammationNeurogenesisInflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maternal immune activation (MIA) can result from a variety of maternal inflammatory factors, including metabolic disorders, nutritional deficits, infections, and psychosocial stress. MIA has been consistently recognized as a major risk factor for neurodevelopmental disorders, and this association seems to be especially important for viral infections as viral exposure during pregnancy was associated with a higher risk of developing neurodevelopmental disorders, such as schizophrenia. In MIA, the gestational parent's inflammatory response to an immune stimulus alters or interrupts fetal development, triggering neurodevelopmental consequences. As MIA can occur in any pregnancy, it is important to understand the many factors at play that contribute to altered brain development in the offspring, especially considering recent global events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The underlying mechanisms by which MIA results in deleterious outcomes are not yet clear, but due to the inflammatory response it initiates, it is becoming apparent that microglia are critically involved. Through investigation of MIA animal models, the role of microglia in this field is becoming more evident. Compelling evidence from animal models indicates that MIA can disrupt synaptic pruning, neuronal progenitor cell proliferation/differentiation, oligodendrogenesis, and more. Microglia appear as an active player, assisting these neural-related functions during healthy development but also mediating MIA-induced disturbances in these critical processes when neurodevelopment is challenged. The present review illustrates this complex web by reviewing recent literature, focusing on the outcomes of MIA resulting from viral mimetic polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid in rodents, to provide a clear description of how MIA impacts microglial functions and what this means for the offspring's neurodevelopment. Moreover, we discuss the possible implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on the neurodevelopment of the current and next generations in the frame of MIA models and propose some putative pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches to prevent or attenuate MIA consequences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it