MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4328053915 · doi:10.46747/cfp.6903186

Aide à la décision d’utiliser ou non les gliflozines pour l’insuffisance cardiaque avec fraction d’éjection supérieure à 40 %, à l’intention des patients

2023· article· fr· W4328053915 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Blair J. MacDonald, Sheri L. Koshman, Ricky D. Turgeon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Family Physician · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environ la moitié des patients souffrant d’insuffisance cardiaque (IC) ont une fraction d’éjection supérieure à 40 % (p. ex. légèrement réduite [41 à 49 %] ou préservée [≥50 %])[1][1],[2][2]. Aucun médicament ne réduit le risque de décès chez les patients atteints d’IA avec

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Family Physician→Same topicDiabetes Treatment and Management→French-language works237,207→