MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4328094596 · doi:10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.3803

The Causes, Consequences and Countermeasures of Financial Fraud Based on the Case of Luckin Coffee

2023· article· en· W4328094596 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xingyuan Bian, Yiru Wu, Zihan Xie, Yiyang Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueBCP Business & Management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuard (computer science)Financial fraudReputationBusinessAuditAccountingGovernment (linguistics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Corporate governanceConstructive fraudFinanceLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Muddy waters made an 89 pages’ report on Luckin coffee, it said Luckin Coffee had been making fictitious trades since the third quarter of 2019. The massive financial fraud at Luckin Coffee has dealt a blow to the Chinese company's reputation.This article through the relevant theories of financial fraud and the actual condition of financial fraud, rui xing coffee GONE theory analysis of the financial fraud motivation, and on the basis of the use of event study research shares for rui xing coffee fraud exception response, in the end, through to the audit institutions, enterprise itself and the government and regulators all three Suggestions, To guard against the consequences of governance failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBCP Business & ManagementSame topicImbalanced Data Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207