Chondrocyte primary cilia lengthening and shortening in response to mediators of osteoarthritis; a role for integrin α1β1 and focal adhesions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Integrin α1β1 protects against osteoarthritis when it is upregulated in the early stages of disease, however, the mechanism behind this is currently unknown. Hypo-osmotic stress, interleukin-1 (IL-1) and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) influence chondrocyte signaling and are important mediators of osteoarthritis. Evidence for primary cilia as a signaling hub for these factors and the involvement of the F-actin cytoskeleton in this response is growing. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of integrin α1β1 in the response of primary cilia and the F-actin cytoskeleton to these osteoarthritic mediators. Design: -null chondrocytes in response to hypo-osmotic stress, IL-1, and TGFβ alone or in combination, and with or without focal adhesion kinase inhibitor. Results: We show that integrin α1β1 and focal adhesions are necessary for cilial lengthening and increases in F-actin peaks with hypo-osmotic stress and IL-1, but are not required for cilial shortening with TGFβ. Furthermore, we established that the chondrocyte primary cilium has a resting length of 2.4 μm, a minimum length of 2.1 μm corresponding to the thickness of the pericellular matrix, and a maximum length of 3.0 μm. Conclusions: While integrin α1β1 is not necessary for the formation of chondrocyte primary cilia and cilial shortening in response to TGFβ, it is necessary for the mediation of cilial lengthening and the formation of F-actin peaks in response to hypo-osmotic stress and IL-1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".