MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4328113282 · doi:10.3389/fphys.2023.1144069

Pathophysiology of Cav1.3 L-type calcium channels in the heart

2023· review· en· W4328113282 on OpenAlexafffund
Sahil Zaveri, Ujala Srivastava, Yongxia Qu, Mohamed Chahine, Mohamed Boutjdir

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Physiology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec
FundersU.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition ActivityU.S. Department of DefenseNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteOffice of Research and DevelopmentCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsSinoatrial nodeInternal medicineContext (archaeology)Atrial fibrillationEndoplasmic reticulumCav1.2MyocyteContraction (grammar)MedicineHeart failureCardiologyAtrioventricular nodeCalcium signalingCalciumEndocrinologyVoltage-dependent calcium channelCell biologyBiologyHeart rateTachycardia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ca2+ plays a crucial role in excitation-contraction coupling in cardiac myocytes. Dysfunctional Ca2+ regulation alters the force of contraction and causes cardiac arrhythmias. Ca2+ entry into cardiomyocytes is mediated mainly through L-type Ca2+ channels, leading to the subsequent Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. L-type Ca2+ channels are composed of the conventional Cav1.2, ubiquitously expressed in all heart chambers, and the developmentally regulated Cav1.3, exclusively expressed in the atria, sinoatrial node, and atrioventricular node in the adult heart. As such, Cav1.3 is implicated in the pathogenesis of sinoatrial and atrioventricular node dysfunction as well as atrial fibrillation. More recently, Cav1.3 de novo expression was suggested in heart failure. Here, we review the functional role, expression levels, and regulation of Cav1.3 in the heart, including in the context of cardiac diseases. We believe that the elucidation of the functional and molecular pathways regulating Cav1.3 in the heart will assist in developing novel targeted therapeutic interventions for the aforementioned arrhythmias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PhysiologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207