Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 1921 et 1922, Blaise Cendrars et Yvan Goll publient chacun une anthologie, qui intègre des récits ou des chants d’origine africaine transcrits et traduits en français : l’Anthologie nègre et Les Cinq Continents. Anthologie mondiale de poésie contemporaine. Puisant dans des corpus des recueils ethnologiques, leur projet a toutefois une visée littéraire. Cette chronologie rapprochée invite à lire les deux volumes en dialogue et à voir dans cet intérêt littéraire de la part des avant-gardes francophones pour des textes africains un appel à une littérature mondiale et un événement inaugural pour la réception de la littérature africaine en France, à l’origine d’un « modèle nègre ». Cet article décrira d’abord le succès de la forme anthologique parmi les avant-gardes historiques, avant de porter son attention sur les anthologies publiées par Yvan Goll et Blaise Cendrars, afin d’en déplier les enjeux spécifiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".