Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current issue of East/West: Journal of Ukrainian Studies appears when Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine enters its second year.This genocidal war is accompanied by Russian propaganda aimed to justify the invasion.As a scholarly venue for up-to-date research regarding Ukraine, EWJUS's publications contribute to countering Russia's disinformation campaign.The current issue opens with a special thematic section that features one research article and one scholarly report dedicated to Ukrainian community centres and archives in Australia and Canada.Four regular articles that follow address a variety of topics: (i) media systems in the so-called "Donetsk People's Republic" and "Luhansk People's Republic"; (ii) Soviet special operations in the Axis occupied territories of Ukraine between 1943 and 1944; (iii) Mykola Lukash's translations as a tool to resist Russification in Soviet Ukraine; and (iv) medieval liturgical translations in Ukraine and Poland.A review essay and several book reviews that appraise recent works in Ukrainian studies complete the issue.Future publications of EWJUS will include two special thematic issues: one dedicated to the environmental humanities in Ukrainian studies and another that focuses on Dnipro and Zaporizhzhia (a companion to previously published thematic issues on Ukraine's major cities-Kharkiv and Odesa).This is the third year of EWJUS's English-Ukrainian translation initiative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".