MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4328130576 · doi:10.1080/00295450.2023.2188145

Heat Transfer Analysis of Core Melt Contact with a CANDU Calandria

2023· article· en· W4328130576 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear Materials and Properties
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nuclear Laboratories
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoriumMaterials scienceHeat transferCore (optical fiber)Inner coreNuclear engineeringNuclear reactor coreNuclear reactorMechanicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a severe accident in a CANDU reactor, disassembly of the core could produce a bed of coarse debris at the bottom of the calandria that would eventually transition into a pool of molten corium. During this process, it may be possible for small amounts of molten core material to contact the calandria wall. The transient heat flow through a calandria wall suddenly contacted by molten Zr or corium is analyzed with a finite element model. Ablation of the wall at its inner surface and the temporary increase in heat flux through its outer surface are calculated for various boundary conditions. Model calculations are compared to observations of the ablation and temperature of a stainless steel plate sprayed by prototypic corium in the Cesium Aerosol Generation-4 or CAGE-4 experiment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it