MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W43510786 · doi:10.1177/002013240004500505

Negative Pressure Ventilation via Chest Cuirass to Decrease Ventilator-Associated Complications in Infants with Acute Respiratory failure: A Case Series

2000· article· en· W43510786 on OpenAlexaff
Hilary Klonin, Brandi N. Bowman, Mark Peters, P Raffeeq, Andrew Durward, Desmond Bohn, Jon N. Meliones, Ira M. Cheifetz

Bibliographic record

VenueRespiratory Care · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentilation (architecture)Positive pressure ventilationMechanical ventilationRespiratory failureAnesthesiaIntensive care medicinePositive pressurePeak inspiratory pressureNoninvasive ventilationPositive end-expiratory pressureRespiratory systemInternal medicineTidal volume

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulmonary and nonpulmonary complications of invasive positive pressure ventilation are well documented in the medical literature. Many of these complications may be minimized by the use of noninvasive ventilation. During various periods of medical history, negative pressure ventilation, a form of noninvasive ventilation, has been used successfully. We report the use of negative pressure ventilation with a chest cuirass to avoid or decrease the complications of invasive positive pressure ventilation in three critically ill infants at two institutions. In each of these cases, chest cuirass ventilation improved the patient's clinical condition and decreased the requirement for more invasive therapy. These cases illustrate the need for further clinical evaluation of the use of negative pressure ventilation utilizing a chest cuirass.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRespiratory CareSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207