MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4352988461 · doi:10.58823/jham.v10i10.81

Syariat Islam dan Implikasi Penerapannya Terhadap Perempuan di Aceh

2021· article· id· W4352988461 on OpenAlexaff
Nurjannah Ismail

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Hak Asasi Manusia · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender and Women's Rights
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Syariat Islam sejak semula telah memberikan hak dan peran kepada kaum perempuan di wilayah domestik maupun wilayah publik. Dalam artikel ini, penulis menyatakan sesungguhnya semangat dan pesan moral yang dikandung syariat Islam adalah persamaan derajat antara laki-laki dan perempuan dan berusaha menegakkan keadilan jender di masyarakat. Lebih lanjut penulis berpendapat walaupun pesan universal syariat Islam adalah keadilan jender, banyak penafsir yang memahami teks-teks syariat yang terdapat dalam Alquran dan hadits -- hanya secara tekstual, parsial dan dilepaskan dari konteks turunnya, sehingga menghasilkan interpretasi yang bias jender dan melahirkan aturan dan doktrin ketidakadilan jender. Hasil interpretasi seperti inilah kemudian yang banyak dipahami dan dipraktikkan di masyarakat Islam sehingga menimbulkan diskriminasi terhadap perempuan termasuk masyarakat perempuan di Aceh, khususnya pada masa sekarang ini. Artikel ini juga mengelaborasi lebih lanjut penyebab diskriminasi terhadap perempuan di Aceh yang masih terjadi hingga kini. Penulis berpendapat adalah ironi ketika syariat Islam di era reformasi diterapkan di bumi Serambi Mekah, kedudukan perempuan di Aceh tidak semulia, bermartabat dan tinggi seperti pada masa lalu. Dalam analisisnya penulis menekankan penegakan syariat Islam memang harus didahului dengan pendidikan masyarakat yang memadai serta pemerataan kesejahteraan dan ekonomi yang berkeadilan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Hak Asasi ManusiaSame topicGender and Women's RightsFrench-language works237,207