Identification of Prognostic Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Metastasis Using Penalized Additive Hazards Regression Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BC) has been reported as one of the most common cancers diagnosed in females throughout the world. Survival rate of BC patients is affected by metastasis. So, exploring its underlying mechanisms and identifying related biomarkers to monitor BC relapse/recurrence using new statistical methods is essential. This study investigated the high-dimensional gene-expression profiles of BC patients using penalized additive hazards regression models. Methods: A publicly available dataset related to the time to metastasis in BC patients (GSE2034) was used. There was information of 22 283 genes expression profiles related to 286 BC patients. Penalized additive hazards regression models with different penalties, including LASSO, SCAD, SICA, MCP and Elastic net were used to identify metastasis related genes. Results: . According the median of the prognostic index calculated using the regression coefficients of the penalized additive hazards model, the patients were labeled as high/low risk groups. A significant difference was detected in the survival curves of the identified groups. The selected genes were examined using validation data and were significantly associated with the hazard of metastasis. Conclusion: are the potential recurrence and metastatic predictors in breast cancer and can be taken into account as candidates for further research in tumorigenesis, invasion, metastasis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of breast cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".