The Yield and Volatility of Cryptocurrency in the Uncertain Market: Evidence from Ethereum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the advent of 2022, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has weakened, the US labor market has recovered, and inflation has been severe, creating the conditions for the Fed to tighten its policies. At the same time, cryptocurrencies as a hot topic in recent years; ETH is one of the most popular cryptocurrencies in the market; this article aims to assess the impact of the Fed's raised interest rates on the yield and volatility of cryptocurrency Ethereum (ETH) based on data on the ETH price and the US dollar/CNY exchange rate since 2022. And further, simulate the impact on the overall cryptocurrency market. This paper constructs VAR and ARMA-GARCH models to analyze ETH returns and volatility variations. The results of these models suggest that the exchange rate rise triggered by the Fed's rate hike has had a negative impact on ETH yields and increased the volatility of its returns. Further, this article recommends that investors should adjust their portfolios according to their risk appetite in an uncertain market environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".