Prescribed Grass Fire Mapping and Rate of Spread Measurement Using NIR Images From a Small Fixed-Wing UAS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article focuses on the mapping and rate of spread (ROS) measurement of grass fires using near infrared (NIR) images acquired by a small fixed-wing unmanned aircraft system (UAS) operating at low altitudes. A new method is proposed for spatiotemporal representation of grass fire evolution using time labeled UAS NIR orthomosaics stitched from aerial images collected at varying time stamps over different regions of fire. Furthermore, a novel NIR intensity variance thresholding method is proposed for accurate identification and delineation of grass fire fronts based on the obtained NIR mosaics in digital numbers. The proposed methods are demonstrated and validated using UAS NIR imagery acquired over a prescribed tallgrass fire in Kansas (around 13 ha.). Three NIR short time-series orthomosaics are generated at a time interval of about 2 min with a spatial registration accuracy of 1.45 m (RMSE). The mean ROS for head, flank, and back tallgrass fires are measured to be 0.28, 0.1, and 0.025 m/s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".