MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4353014910 · doi:10.1111/petr.14493

Incidence of cytomegalovirus <scp>DNAemia</scp> in pediatric kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients: Efficacy and risk factors associated with failure of weight‐based dosed valganciclovir prophylaxis

2023· article· en· W4353014910 on OpenAlexaff
Rochelle Liverman, Anastacia Serluco, Gwen Nance, Roshan George, Dellys Soler Rodriguez, Shriprasad R. Deshpande, Chad Mao, Rouba Garro, İnci Yıldırım

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Transplantation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineValganciclovirIncidence (geometry)Retrospective cohort studyCohortDosingInternal medicineLiver transplantationCumulative incidenceKidney transplantKidney transplantationSurgeryKidneyPediatricsTransplantationHuman cytomegalovirusGanciclovirImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is associated with morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR). Valganciclovir (VGC) is extensively used for prophylaxis. Optimal dosing in children, risk factors for failure, and the impact of dose adjustments on CMV DNAemia is not well established. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of pediatric SOTR transplanted between 2010-2018 evaluated the epidemiology of CMV DNAemia and used Cox-regression to assess the risk factors for CMV DNAemia within one-year following SOTR. RESULTS: In 393 pediatric SOTR (heart [96, 24.4%], kidney [180, 45.6%], liver [117, 29.8%]; median age 9.5 ± 0.3 years), overall CMV DNAemia incidence was 6.6/10 000 days (95%CI 5.1/10 000-7.9/10 000) and varied by organ groups: heart 8.2/10 000 days (95%CI 4.9/10 000-11.4/10 000), kidney 5.8/10 000 days (95%CI 3.9/10 000-7.8/10 000), liver 6.2/10 000 days (95%CI 3.7/10 000-8.7/10 000). CMV DNAemia was detected in 75 of 275 (27.2%) patients who received prophylaxis (40 cases occurred during prophylaxis and 35 occurred after completion of prophylaxis). The median VGC dose given according to institutional weight-based algorithm was approximately 1.5-fold lower than the manufacturer-recommended dose. This discordance was more prominent at younger age groups (3.2-fold lower in <2-year-old [100 mg versus 325 mg], 2.5-fold lower in <6-year-old [200 mg versus 447 mg]). Dose reduction due to adverse events was an independent risk factor for breakthrough CMV DNAemia (hazard ratio 2.2, 95%CI 1.2-3.8) among patients with similar age, CMV risk stratification, starting VGC dose, immunosuppressive therapy, and organ group. CONCLUSION: CMV events occurred while on VGC prophylaxis. Weight-based VGC may prevent supratherapeutic VGC exposure especially in younger children. Dose reduction of VGC prophylaxis for adverse event management places patients at an increased risk for CMV DNAemia suggesting other agents with fewer adverse effects should be considered and need to be studied in children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric TransplantationSame topicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus researchFrench-language works237,207