Ten to 13-Year Results of Delta Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 30 Years Old
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We previously reported mid-term results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using Delta ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings in 72 patients (86 hips) who were <30 years old. Noise was noted in 8 (9.3%) of the hips, no osteolysis or loosening was detected, and no patient required reoperation. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications, and survivorship at >10 years after THA using Delta CoC bearings in patients who were <30 years old. METHODS: Cementless THA with a Delta CoC bearing was performed between March 2008 and January 2012 in 91 hips of 76 patients who were <30 years old. Eighty-five hips in 71 patients (44 men and 27 women) with a mean age of 25.9 years (range, 16 to 29 years) at surgery were followed for a mean of 10.9 years (range, 10 to 13 years). RESULTS: No ceramic bearings fractured. The incidence of squeaking increased to 5.9% (5 of 85), but the squeaking was not reproducible within individual patients. Periprosthetic osteolysis developed in 3 hips (3 patients): around the stem in 2 and around the metal shell in 1. The stem in 1 hip underwent revision because of a Vancouver type-B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture. One patient with systemic lupus erythematosus underwent irrigation and debridement for periprosthetic joint infection. Survivorship free of reoperation for any reason was 92.4% (95% confidence interval, 82.4% to 100%) at 13 years. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results and survivorship of Delta CoC THA in patients <30 years old were favorable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".