MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4353041063 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2716622/v1

MSRHNN:Multidimensional Social Relation under Heterogeneous Neural Network for Recommendation

2023· preprint· en· W4353041063 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsVanier CollegeUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGraphTheoretical computer scienceHeterogeneous networkDynamic network analysisPopularitySocial network (sociolinguistics)Node (physics)Artificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkData miningMachine learningSocial mediaComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract With the growing popularity of mobile smart devices and the availability of 4G and 5G networks, social recommendation systems have become a hot research topic for industrial applications. Social networks among users are built through social information, which can improve collaborative filtering and solve cold start and sparsity problems. Graph convolutional networks have been widely used to represent the interactions and structural relationships among entities, but the exponential increase of the domain introduces a new problem. In this paper, we propose a multidimensional social relation under heterogeneous neural network (MSRHNN). By embedding historical evaluations, various social networks constituting different dimensions, the attention integration of different social networks on user preferences is achieved. A static graph encoder is used to process the node representation of each heterogeneous graph at different time steps, which includes the node attribute information and edge information, to capture the changing feature information of the nodes in all time steps of the dynamic graph, and to obtain an effective node representation at each time step. The goal of the heterogeneous dynamic graph neural network is to capture the changing node representations of the same nodes and different nodes in the graph network at different time steps, in order to better perform the task of node classification in dynamic graphs. In this paper, the model of heterogeneous dynamic graph neural network is verified from data, and experiments show that heterogeneous dynamic graph neural network outperforms other representation learning methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it