MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4353057084 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c08858

Spectroscopic Properties of Semiconductor Nanoparticles near the Solid-to-Liquid Phase Transition

2023· article· en· W4353057084 on OpenAlexaff
Jan Menser, Kyle J. Daun, Christof Schulz

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanoparticleSemiconductorParticle sizePhase transitionParticle (ecology)GermaniumAbsorption (acoustics)Volume fractionChemical physicsDielectricScatteringPhase (matter)SiliconMolecular physicsCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyOpticsOptoelectronicsChemistryPhysical chemistryPhysicsOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gas-phase synthesis of semiconductor nanoparticles is often supported by optical in situ measurements to determine the particle size, phase, and volume fraction. These attributes are connected to the optical properties of these particles, which depend strongly on the temperature and particle size as well as the phase transition near the melting point. To support such measurements, we derive a Lorentz-oscillator model for solid silicon and germanium with temperature- and particle-size-dependent transition energies, line widths, and oscillator strengths. The model yields the complex dielectric function that is then processed using Mie theory to calculate size-dependent absorption and scattering cross-sections for nanoparticles as well as nanoparticle aerosols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207