MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4353080511 · doi:10.54097/hset.v34i.5439

Implementation of Music Genre Classifier Using KNN Algorithm

2023· article· en· W4353080511 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHighlights in Science Engineering and Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePreprocessorCluster analysisCentroidClassifier (UML)Artificial intelligenceData pre-processingMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As music history grew, music began to diversify into different genres. Thisstudy aims to implement a music genre classifier using the KNN algorithm and a faster method. The KNN algorithm is accurate but with long execution time. This study implements a new method that can speed up the process of the KNN algorithm, and the K-means clustering algorithm inspires the idea. The dataset is preprocessed using the new idea. The program will select the song that is the centroid of the genre and use the method of the KNN to return the closest genre based on the distance from the test sample to the centroid. In conclusion, the new method did not perform well in accuracy but sped up the program. This study provides a great reference for the music genre classification problem in the machine learning domain. The study investigates an infeasible method in preprocessing data for the KNN algorithm optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it