Single-shot refractive index slice imaging using spectrally multiplexed optical transfer function reshaping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The refractive index (RI) of cells and tissues is crucial in pathophysiology as a noninvasive and quantitative imaging contrast. Although its measurements have been demonstrated using three-dimensional quantitative phase imaging methods, these methods often require bulky interferometric setups or multiple measurements, which limits the measurement sensitivity and speed. Here, we present a single-shot RI imaging method that visualizes the RI of the in-focus region of a sample. By exploiting spectral multiplexing and optical transfer function engineering, three color-coded intensity images of a sample with three optimized illuminations were simultaneously obtained in a single-shot measurement. The measured intensity images were then deconvoluted to obtain the RI image of the in-focus slice of the sample. As a proof of concept, a setup was built using Fresnel lenses and a liquid-crystal display. For validation purposes, we measured microspheres of known RI and cross-validated the results with simulated results. Various static and highly dynamic biological cells were imaged to demonstrate that the proposed method can conduct single-shot RI slice imaging of biological samples with subcellular resolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".