MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4353091677 · doi:10.35265/2236-6717-231-12443

CAPITALISMO E RELIGIOSIDADE AMBIENTAL: UMA REFLEXÃO A LUZ DA CARTA ENCÍCLICA LAUDATO SI’ DO SANTO PADRE FRANCISCO

2023· article· en· W4353091677 on OpenAlexaff
Erasmo Aparecido Píccolo, ZILDO GALLO

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Científica Semana Acadêmica · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Sustainability and Education
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncyclicalSAINTFaithTheologySubject (documents)Environmental ethicsPolitical scienceSociologyLawPhilosophyHistoryLibrary scienceArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The encyclical Laudato Si’ concluded in 2015 is a milestone for ecoteology, it is the first document issued by a Pontiff fully dedicated to the subject. The objective was to analyze the environmental religious behavior from the encyclical Laudato Si' of Pope Francis and assumed the profile of bibliographical research of the descriptive type, starting from the analysis of the encyclical, the sacred scriptures, articles, theses, dissertations and books. The document denounces the problem of the economic and financial system that oppresses the environment and living beings to the detriment of a privileged few, urging for an attitude of intolerance towards the injustices and inequalities committed. The orientation is for the Church to reflect on faith and reason, act in a humble, welcoming way and promote dialogue. The encyclical leads to an ecological conversion following the example of the Patron of Ecology – Saint Francis of Assisi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.013
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Científica Semana AcadêmicaSame topicEnvironmental Sustainability and EducationFrench-language works237,207