MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4353100297 · doi:10.18280/ts.400131

Automatic Detection of Knee Osteoarthritis Disease with the Developed CNN, NCA and SVM Based Hybrid Model

2023· article· en· W4353100297 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Serpil Aslan

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisSupport vector machineComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)MedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knee osteoarthritis (Knee-OA) is one of the most common musculoskeletal diseases caused by loss of cartilage and bone changes in the joint.Prediction of early Knee-OA based on early bone tissue analysis is challenging in medical image analysis.If the disease is detected in the later stages, it may cause serious problems, such as the need for knee replacement.Therefore, the detection of Knee-OA disease is essential.With the developing technology, computer-aided systems have been frequently used in the biomedical field in recent years.A deep learning-based hybrid model for the early diagnosis and treatment of Knee-OA disease was developed in this study.In the developed hybrid model, three different CNN architectures were used as the base, and feature extraction was made with these architectures.The features obtained in three different architectures are combined to bring together different features of the same image.After merging, the neighboring component analysis (NCA) size reduction method was used to remove unnecessary features.Since unnecessary features are eliminated from the feature map optimized with NCA, the proposed hybrid model will work faster and produce more successful results.Finally, the feature map optimized with NCA was classified with six different classifiers.The proposed model was also compared to eight different CNN architectures.In comparison to CNN architectures, the proposed hybrid model achieved the highest accuracy performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicMedical Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207