A New Respiratory Diseases Detection Model in Chest X-Ray Images Using CNN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based deep learning techniques have recently demonstrated increased potential and effectiveness in image recognition applications, such as those involving medical images. Deep-learning models can recognize targets with performance comparable to radiologists when used with CXR. The primary goal of this research is to examine a deep learning technique used on the radiography dataset to detect COVID-19 in X-ray medical images. The proposed system consists of several stages, from pre-processing, passing through the feature reduction using more than one technique, to the classification stage based on a proposed model. The test was applied to the COVID-19 Radiography dataset of normal and three lung infections (COVID-19, Viral Pneumonia, and Lung Opacity). The proposed CNN model has shown its ability to classify COVID, normal, and other lung infections with perfect accuracy of 99.94%. Consequently, the AI-based early-stage detection algorithms will be enhanced, increasing the accuracy of the X-ray-based modality for the screening of various lung diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".