MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4353100309 · doi:10.18280/ts.400111

Prediction of Vegetation Change by Discrete Wavelet Decomposition Based on Remote Sensing Time Series Images

2023· article· en· W4353100309 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuehong Long, Jianxin Qin, Ke Wang, Yun Xue, Ling Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEducation Department of Hunan Province
KeywordsRemote sensingSeries (stratigraphy)Vegetation (pathology)WaveletDecompositionChange detectionTime seriesDiscrete wavelet transformComputer scienceWavelet transformEnvironmental scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)GeologyMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of remote sensing technology has accumulated a large number of remote sensing image time series data for human monitoring of surface vegetation change, which provides a basis for vegetation change prediction.In order to improve the prediction accuracy of vegetation change, this paper uses discrete wavelet to decompose remote sensing image sequences at multiple scales, to explore the difference of influence of different temporal scale change characteristics on vegetation spatio-temporal change prediction, and find the best decomposition scale for vegetation change prediction.In this paper, the research object is the MODIS 13Q1 EVI image data of Hunan Province from 2001 to 2021.The discrete wavelet is adopted to obtain multi-scale vegetation trend components and detailed component sequences, and then complete the LSTM modeling prediction and comparison.The following are the experimental findings: the predictive ability of the discrete wavelet decomposition sequence group is better than that of the original EVI time series to varying degrees.The order of prediction accuracy is: monthly scale > seasonal scale > annual scale > original EVI time series.Thus, it is of reference significance to the research of application scenarios of change prediction of other regionalized variables with multi-scale characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207