MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4353100313 · doi:10.18280/ts.400138

Biometric User Authentication System via Fingerprints Using Novel Hybrid Optimization Tuned Deep Learning Strategy

2023· article· en· W4353100313 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Senthil Kumar Natarajan, R. Ramadevi, Jaisankar Narayanasamy, A. Aravind

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiometricsComputer scienceAuthentication (law)Artificial intelligenceDeep learningFingerprint (computing)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to security concerns, the necessity for authentication and identity techniques has increased in the modern world.A novel Accurate and Automated Fingerprint Biometric Authentication Model (AAFBAM) is introduced.The operation of the suggested AAFBAM is divided into two parts: (a) enrollment and (b) verification.During the enrollment phase, the database is prepared, and the input fingerprint is authenticated during the identification phase.The enrollment phase includes the data acquisition stage, preprocessing feature extraction stage, and minutiae point detection phase.The minutiae point detection is performed using the MISHO-based Optimized Deep Neural Network (MISHO-DNN) classifier.The weight function of DNN is tuned optimally using the proposed Memory Integrated Spotted Hyena Optimization (MISHO) algorithm to enhance its detection accuracy.The Verification Phase includes the preprocessing, feature extraction stage, minutiae point detection with MISHO-DNN, minutia matching, and minutiae score evaluation.Here, the minutiae score is obtained by matching minutiae from both phases and is compared with the threshold value.When the minutiae score exceeds the threshold, the user is identified as the genuine user, and their request is accepted.Otherwise, the user is recognized as an unauthenticated user, and their request is rejected.Finally, a comparative evaluation is conducted to validate the efficiency of the projected model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.737

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207