The Research on the Social Media Addiction and Mental Disorders
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Along with the rapid development of media technology, social media has become an indispensable part of human life. Social media enables the spread of information that exceeds the restriction of physical and temporal boundaries. While enhancing the convenience and connectedness of human beings, social media, to some extent, grievously affects people’s internal well-being. The widespread use of media platforms leads to social media addiction, especially among the young generation.This article takes teenagers as the research object, and uses the literature reading method to explore the causes and consequences of social media addiction. According to the research results, the reason about social media additions includes biological reasons, psychological reasons and social reasons. Consequences of social media addition among young generations include the shape of toxic beauty standards, body shaming, beauty and eating disorders. Social media has created a platform where people share only the positive part of themselves; peer pressure has formed under these circumstances. Adolescents are predominantly the victims of mainstream beauty standards. Body shaming and eating disorders are the representative psychological impacts due to the dissatisfaction with one's physical characteristics and the desire to be more "beautiful".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it