MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4353109306 · doi:10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-15654

Reviewers

2023· article· en· W4353109306 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of Hawai'i at MānoaUniversidad San Francisco de QuitoHohai UniversityLanzhou University of TechnologyHebei UniversitySilesian University of TechnologyNational Cheng Kung UniversityPennsylvania State UniversityIstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiKing Mongkut's University of Technology North BangkokChinese Academy of ForestrySouth China University of TechnologyUniversidad de CantabriaRijkswaterstaatBMS College of EngineeringUniversity of TokushimaIsfahan University of TechnologyShandong UniversityPolitechnika WarszawskaSuranaree University of TechnologyTongji UniversityHunan UniversityHebei University of EngineeringUniversität WienUniversidad del NorteEge ÜniversitesiSemnan UniversityIran University of Science and TechnologyYonsei UniversityDalian University of TechnologyMissouri University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of WollongongThapar Institute of Engineering and TechnologyUniversiti Malaysia PahangUniversity of LouisvilleUniversity of TorontoHenan Polytechnic UniversityUniversity of Texas at San AntonioUniversity of AlbertaArkansas State UniversityBeijing University of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureTechnische Universität WienSzkola Glówna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w WarszawieKanazawa UniversityUniversity of GuilanNew Mexico State UniversityMississippi State UniversitySoutheast UniversityIndian Institute of Technology, PatnaSun Yat-sen UniversityUniversity of Hawai'iSveučilište u ZagrebuUniversity of WashingtonWuhan UniversityQueen's UniversityUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade Federal do PampaIncheon National UniversityTianjin UniversityTechnische Universität DresdenFirat ÜniversitesiUniversity of Engineering and Technology, LahoreUniversity of MiamiUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnOregon State UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaQingdao Technological UniversityHarbin Institute of TechnologyÉcole Normale SupérieureUniversité de StrasbourgDrexel UniversityWashington State UniversityUniversità degli Studi di Cassino e del Lazio MeridionaleVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityRMIT UniversityBeijing University of TechnologyAuburn UniversityOklahoma State UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaSouth Dakota State UniversityUniversity of DerbyHanyang UniversityU.S. Department of TransportationHebei University of TechnologyArizona State UniversityTennessee Department of TransportationMarquette UniversityUniversity of MissouriWestern Sydney UniversityNational Central UniversityChina Three Gorges UniversityBayburt ÜniversitesiLanzhou UniversityChang'an UniversityU.S. Department of AgricultureUniversity of South AfricaChongqing Jiaotong UniversityPurdue UniversityWuhan University of Technology
KeywordsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.087
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.087
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3440.188

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials in Civil EngineeringFrench-language works237,207