MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La revista Brujas, militancia feminista en democracia

2013· article· es· W435755427 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paula Torricella

Bibliographic record

VenueEntrehojas Revista de Estudios Hispánicos · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender and Feminist Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesContext (archaeology)DemocracyPolitical sciencePoliticsArtHistoryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar un primer abordaje de la revista feminista Brujas, que comienza a publicarse en la ciudad de Buenos Aires en el año 1982. Más particularmente, presto atención a sus primeros años, al modo en que se sitúa en una coyuntura de transición y a los temas que juzga de interés prioritario para el movimiento político al que pertenece. The aim of this paper is to present a first approach to the argentinian feminist journal Brujas, first published in Buenos Aires in 1982. Attention is paid to its early years and the way it situates itself in the context of transition to democracy..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntrehojas Revista de Estudios HispánicosSame topicGender and Feminist StudiesFrench-language works237,207