MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4360583554 · doi:10.1017/9781846153716.003

Context

2005· other· en· W4360583554 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John D. Grainger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSiegeContext (archaeology)AllianceSpanish Civil WarHistoryCONTESTAncient historyEconomic historyGeographyEthnologyPolitical scienceLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By mid-1781, when the military and naval crisis began which culminated in the fighting at Yorktown in October, the War of the American Rebellion had been going on for six years. Beginning with the skirmishes at Bunker Hill, at Concord, and at Lexington in Massachusetts, and the siege of the British forces in Boston in 1775, the area involved in the war had repeatedly widened, first throughout British North America, including Canada, then into the waters of the Atlantic Ocean and the Caribbean Sea, then in 1778 to Europe. France had been keen to encourage the rebels from the very first, in part to gain revenge for its defeat in the previous bout of the Anglo-French contest which had been a fixture in European affairs since the 1670s, but also in the hope that pieces of British imperial territory could be acquired. French arms and supplies had been shipped to the rebels, clandestinely at first, and then openly, and then France had joined in militarily. Spain was persuaded and encouraged to participate by an alliance with France, the Family Compact, agreed in 1779; the next year the British forced the Dutch to fight by declaring war, after what they considered to be years of considerable provocation. Each new participant extended the war to new geographical areas, not just in Europe but overseas, and ever more distantly from the original seat of fighting in North America. The French sent forces to the Indian Ocean, and the Dutch territory in South Africa became involved, as did the Dutch lands and islands in India, Indonesia, and the West Indies. And, as more countries joined in, and more areas were affected, so the original purpose of the fighting became overlaid by other, more immediate, priorities. For the British, the War of the American Rebellion widened into a war, not just for part of the empire, but at times for its very survival. The Spanish involvement was, for Britain, particularly serious, since it brought into action a large, though less than efficient, navy which was able to join with that of the French, so that together they considerably outnumbered the Royal Navy; in addition the Spanish participation involved major sieges of Gibraltar and Minorca, and a Spanish campaign in Florida. In 1779 a serious attempt to invade the British Isles was mounted by a joint Franco- Spanish fleet and army.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1840.056

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics→French-language works237,207→