MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360584657 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2023.3260704

Digital Hardware Implementations of Spiking Neural Networks With Selective Input Sparsity for Edge Inferences in Controlled Image Acquisition Environments

2023· article· en· W4360584657 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayImplementationBaseline (sea)InferenceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionArtificial neural networkComputer hardwareComputer architectureImage (mathematics)Spiking neural networkArtificial intelligenceComputer engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital hardware implementations of Spiking Neural Networks designed using Selective Input Sparsity (SIS) are proposed for edge inference applications in image classification where the image acquisition environment is controlled. These sparsely connected networks are well-suited to area-constrained applications as they require fewer neurons and synapses than baseline Fully Connected (FC) networks of analogous structures. The SIS networks were validated on FPGA, and baseline FC networks were also implemented on FGPA for comparison. The SIS networks require fewer hardware resources and make inferences faster than the baseline FC networks without substantial impact on the classification accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it