MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360593316 · doi:10.1162/desi_r_00719

Livable Proximity: Ideas for the City that Cares

2023· article· en· W4360593316 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDesign Issues · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture and Computational Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconCitationLibrary scienceCarrDownloadSociologyMedia studiesArt historyArtWorld Wide WebComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

April 01 2023 Livable Proximity: Ideas for the City that Cares Livable Proximity: Ideas for the City that Cares by Ezio Manzini (Milan: Bocconi University Press, 2022), ISBN: 978-88-31322-38-6, 158 pages, paperback ($29.95) Jorge Frascara Jorge Frascara Jorge Frascara is Professor Emeritus, University of Alberta; Honorary Professor, Emily Carr University, Canada; Fellow, Society of Graphic Designers of Canada; former President, Icograda; author of eleven books and more than 90 articles; advisor of the Doctoral Program in Design Sciences, University of Venice; and editorial advisor of four professional journals. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Jorge Frascara Jorge Frascara is Professor Emeritus, University of Alberta; Honorary Professor, Emily Carr University, Canada; Fellow, Society of Graphic Designers of Canada; former President, Icograda; author of eleven books and more than 90 articles; advisor of the Doctoral Program in Design Sciences, University of Venice; and editorial advisor of four professional journals. Online Issn: 1531-4790 Print Issn: 0747-9360 © 2023 Massachusetts Institute of Technology2023Massachusetts Institute of Technology Design Issues (2023) 39 (2): 86–87. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_r_00719 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Jorge Frascara; Livable Proximity: Ideas for the City that Cares. Design Issues 2023; 39 (2): 86–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_r_00719 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsDesign Issues Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 2023 Massachusetts Institute of Technology2023Massachusetts Institute of Technology Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it