MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360593316 · doi:10.1162/desi_r_00719

Livable Proximity: Ideas for the City that Cares

2023· article· en· W4360593316 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jorge Frascara

Bibliographic record

VenueDesign Issues · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture and Computational Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconCitationLibrary scienceCarrDownloadSociologyMedia studiesArt historyArtWorld Wide WebComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

April 01 2023 Livable Proximity: Ideas for the City that Cares Livable Proximity: Ideas for the City that Cares by Ezio Manzini (Milan: Bocconi University Press, 2022), ISBN: 978-88-31322-38-6, 158 pages, paperback ($29.95) Jorge Frascara Jorge Frascara Jorge Frascara is Professor Emeritus, University of Alberta; Honorary Professor, Emily Carr University, Canada; Fellow, Society of Graphic Designers of Canada; former President, Icograda; author of eleven books and more than 90 articles; advisor of the Doctoral Program in Design Sciences, University of Venice; and editorial advisor of four professional journals. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Jorge Frascara Jorge Frascara is Professor Emeritus, University of Alberta; Honorary Professor, Emily Carr University, Canada; Fellow, Society of Graphic Designers of Canada; former President, Icograda; author of eleven books and more than 90 articles; advisor of the Doctoral Program in Design Sciences, University of Venice; and editorial advisor of four professional journals. Online Issn: 1531-4790 Print Issn: 0747-9360 © 2023 Massachusetts Institute of Technology2023Massachusetts Institute of Technology Design Issues (2023) 39 (2): 86–87. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_r_00719 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Jorge Frascara; Livable Proximity: Ideas for the City that Cares. Design Issues 2023; 39 (2): 86–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_r_00719 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsDesign Issues Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 2023 Massachusetts Institute of Technology2023Massachusetts Institute of Technology Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0120.009
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDesign IssuesSame topicArchitecture and Computational DesignFrench-language works237,207