MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360594639 · doi:10.1163/9789047401025_005

Main Bibliography and Bibliographical Abbreviations

2004· book-chapter· en· W4360594639 on OpenAlexfundno aff
David A. King

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHistorical Astronomy and Related Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Ethnic Affairs Commission of the People's Republic of ChinaAligarh Muslim UniversityUniversity of OxfordUniversity of CambridgeUniversitat de Barcelonaİslam Tarih, Sanat ve Kültür Araştırma MerkeziBrown UniversityHarvard UniversityCambridge Philosophical SocietyAmerican Philosophical SocietyPrinceton UniversityCarnegie Institution of WashingtonAmerican University of BeirutJapan Nuclear Energy Safety OrganizationRoyal Astronomical SocietyYork UniversityCabildo de TenerifeScientific Instrument SocietySmithsonian Institution
KeywordsBibliographyLibrary scienceHistoryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reader will find here the main modem sources for the history of Islamic astronomy and astronomical instrumentation, including conference proceedings and exhibition catalogues.Many studies have been reprinted in various collected volumes, notably those published by Variorum; those individual studies related to astronomical timekeeping and related aspects of mathematical astronomy which are particularly relevant to this study are also listed here.The abbreviations introduced below are used throughout this book.Further bibliographical lists are given in VIII (comparison of aspects of Islamic and medieval European science) and X (instrumentation), and the works cited there are listed below without abbreviated titles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0090.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical Astronomy and Related StudiesFrench-language works237,207