MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360595145 · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3227267

Tensor-Empowered Adaptive Learning for Few-Shot Streaming Tasks

2023· article· en· W4360595145 on OpenAlexaff
Bocheng Ren, Laurence T. Yang, Qingchen Zhang, Jun Feng, Xin Nie

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTensor (intrinsic definition)Task (project management)Artificial intelligenceStreaming algorithmAdaptation (eye)ScratchDependency (UML)Machine learningMathematicsUpper and lower bounds

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Various stream learning methods are emerging in an endless stream to provide a wealth of solutions for artificial intelligence in streaming data scenarios. However, when each data stream is oriented to a different target space, it forces stream learning approaches oriented to the same task to be no longer applicable. Due to inconsistent target spaces for different tasks, the previous approaches fail on the new streaming tasks or it is impracticable to be trained from scratch with few labeled samples at the beginning. To this end, we have proposed an adaptive learning scheme for few-shot streaming tasks with the contributions of tensor and meta-learning. This adaptive scheme is conducive to mitigating the domain shift when a new task has few labeled samples. We elaborate a novel tensor-empowered attention mechanism derived from nonlocal neural networks, which enables to capture long-range dependency and preserve the high-dimensional structure to refine the global features of streaming tasks. Furthermore, we develop a fine-grained similarity computing approach, which is prone to better characterize the difference across few-shot streaming tasks. To show the superiority of our method, we have carried out extensive experiments on three popular few-shot datasets to simulate streaming tasks and evaluate the performance of adaptation. The results show that our proposed method has achieved competitive performance for few-shot streaming tasks compared with the state-of-the-art (SOTA).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning SystemsSame topicDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningFrench-language works237,207