The relationship between cytochrome c oxidase, CBF and CMRO <sub>2</sub> in mouse cortex: A NIRS-MRI study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantifying relationships between cerebral blood flow (CBF), mitochondrial function (cytochrome c oxidase oxidation state), and metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO 2 ) could provide useful insight into normal neurovascular coupling, as well as regulation of oxidative metabolism in neurological disorders. This paper uses a multimodal NIRS-MRI method to quantify these parameters in rodent brain and, in so doing, provides novel information on the regulation of oxygen metabolism by stimulating with hypercapnia or variations in oxygenation. Under hypercapnia, although oxygenation, oxidation state, and CBF increased, there was no increase in CMRO 2 . Also, there was no correlation between CBF and CCO oxidation state. Conversely, changing oxygenation resulted in a strong correlation between the oxidation of CCO and CBF. This proves that the association between CBF and the redox state of CCO is not fixed and depends on the type of perturbation. Having a means to measure CBF and CCO oxidation state simultaneously will help understanding their contribution to intact neurovascular coupling and detecting abnormal cellular oxygen metabolism in many neurological disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".