Automated Adolescence Scoliosis Detection Using Augmented U-Net With Non-square Kernels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Scoliosis is a deformity of the spine, and as a measure of scoliosis severity, Cobb angle is fundamental to the diagnosis of deformities that require treatment. Conventional Cobb angle measurement and assessment is usually done manually, which is inherently time-consuming, and associated with high inter- and intra-observer variability. While there exist automatic scoliosis measurement methods, they suffer from insufficient accuracy. In this work, we propose a two-step segmentation-based deep learning architecture to automate Cobb angle measurement for scoliosis assessment using X-Ray images. Methods: The proposed architecture involves two steps. In the first step, we utilize a novel Augmented U-Net architecture to generate segmentations of vertebrae. The second step includes a non-learning-based pipeline to extract landmark coordinates from the segmented vertebrae and filter undesirable landmarks. Results: Our proposed Augmented U-Net architecture achieved a Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error of 9.2%, with approximately 90% of estimations having less than 10 degrees difference compared with the AASCE-MICCAI challenge 2019 dataset ground truths. We further validated the model using an internal dataset and achieved almost the same level of performance. Conclusion: The proposed architecture is robust in providing automated spinal vertebrae segmentations and Cobb angle measurement, and is potentially generalizable to real-world clinical settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".