MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360601962 · doi:10.1093/ckj/sfad053

Rationale and design of CONTINUITY: a Phase 4 randomized controlled trial of continued post-discharge sodium zirconium cyclosilicate treatment versus standard of care for hyperkalemia in chronic kidney disease

2023· article· en· W4360601962 on OpenAlexaff
James O. Burton, Alaster Allum, Alpesh Amin, Cecilia Linde, Eva Lesén, Carl Mellström, James M. Eudicone, Manish M. Sood

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Kidney Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPotassium and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
FundersAstraZeneca
KeywordsHyperkalemiaMedicineKidney diseaseTolerabilityRandomized controlled trialRenal functionClinical endpointInternal medicineIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background Individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) hospitalized with hyperkalemia are at risk of hyperkalemia recurrence and re-hospitalization. We present the rationale and design of CONTINUITY, a study to examine the efficacy of continuing sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC)—an oral, highly selective potassium (K+) binder—compared with standard of care (SoC) on maintaining normokalemia and reducing re-hospitalization and resource utilization among participants with CKD hospitalized with hyperkalemia. Methods This Phase 4, randomized, open-label, multicenter study will enroll adults with Stage 3b–5 CKD and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m2, within 3 months of eligibility screening, hospitalized with a serum potassium (sK+) level of >5.0–≤6.5 mmol/L, without ongoing K+ binder treatment. The study will include an in-hospital phase, where participants receive SZC for 2–21 days, and an outpatient (post-discharge) phase. At discharge, participants with sK+ 3.5–5.0 mmol/L will be randomized (1:1) to SZC or SoC and monitored for 180 days. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of normokalemia at 180 days. Secondary outcomes include incidence and number of hospital admissions or emergency department visits both with hyperkalemia as a contributing factor, and renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitor down-titration. The safety and tolerability of SZC will be evaluated. Ethics approval has been received from all relevant ethics committees. Enrollment started March 2022 and the estimated study end date is December 2023. Conclusions This study will assess the potential of SZC versus SoC in managing people with CKD and hyperkalemia post-discharge. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05347693; EudraCT: 2021-003527-14, registered on 19 October 2021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.035
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0350.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Kidney JournalSame topicPotassium and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207