Optimizing the Cleaning and Disinfection Scheme for Dockless Shared Bikes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shared bikes can help cities achieve carbon neutrality goals. Cleaning and disinfection are vital procedures of the maintenance of shared bikes, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic because shared bikes could be a transmission intermediary of viruses. This study proposes an optimization model of the cleaning and disinfection scheme of the dockless shared bikes. The disinfection is assumed to be performed at night, when the usage is lowest. By regarding the disinfection staff as traveling salesmen, the model is formulated as an extension of the Multidepot Multiple Traveling Salesman Problem (MDMTSP). The objective function is to minimize the total cost; which consists of the cost associated with the working time and per-capita cost of the disinfection staff. A heuristic algorithm combining k -means clustering and genetic algorithm (K-GA) is adopted to find the lower bound solution. Then, the K-GA-adjustment algorithm has been adopted to find the solutions that satisfy the constraints. To reduce the computing time needed, an approximate function for the lower bound of the optimal number of disinfection staff is obtained by constructing a Continuous Approximation (CA) model. A case study based on real location data of shared bikes in Chengdu, China, is performed to show how the maintenance department could adopt the optimization framework to design an efficient scheme to clean and disinfect the shared bikes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".