MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360609533 · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0011188

Anticipating visceral leishmaniasis epidemics due to the conflict in Northern Ethiopia

2023· article· en· W4360609533 on OpenAlexaff
Carl Boodman, Johan van Griensven, Nitin Gupta, Ermias Diro, Koert Ritmeijer

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisceral leishmaniasisLeishmaniasisNeglected tropical diseasesMalariaEndemic diseasesVirologyLeishmaniaGeographyEnvironmental healthMedicineImmunologyPublic healthPathologyParasite hosting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On November 4, 2020, conflict erupted between the Ethiopian federal government and the Northern Ethiopian regional forces called the Tigray People's Liberation Front [1,2].The crisis has since driven over 4 million people to flee their homes, often with little possessions and no shelter, remaining internally displaced in the Tigray, Afar, and Amhara regions known to be endemic for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) [1][2][3][4].The Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre estimates that this conflict triggered the "highest displacement figures ever recorded for any country in any given year" [2].An additional 59,000 people have sought safety in eastern Sudan, concentrated around Gedaref and southern Kassala states, also known to be highly endemic for VL [4,5].East Africa currently composes the global epicenter of VL, accounting for 66% of the reported cases worldwide [6].It also comprises the area with the highest rate of VL-HIV coinfection, further amplifying VL transmission [4,7].Considering that conflict has previously triggered large VL epidemics with elevated case fatality, additional funding and operational coordination for a regional approach to VL screening, treatment and prevention will be required for the WHO to reach its goal of eliminating this neglected tropical disease as a public health problem by 2030 [4,5,8,9].Visceral leishmaniasis is a vector-borne disease transmitted by sandflies [3,4].This systemic disease affects the reticuloendothelial system and is fatal if untreated [4].In East Africa, visceral leishmaniasis is caused by Leishmania donovani and is predominantly transmitted by the Phlebotomus orientalis sandflies that thrive in the Acacia-Balanites forests along Ethiopia's northwestern border with Sudan [3].Phlebotomus orientalis is exophagic, preferring to bite the human host outside the home [10].Thus, sleeping outdoors is a significant risk factor for VL, a factor that renders refugees without shelter particularly vulnerable to VL acquisition [9,10].Since VL in East Africa is principally understood to be anthroponotic, human migration acts as one of the primary drivers of disease transmission [4,9].Previous refugee crises have produced large deadly epidemics of VL in East Africa [5,8].Within a year of conflict breaking out in South Sudan in 2013, cases of VL more than tripled in the Jonglei and Upper Nile States [5].Earlier wars catalyzed devastating VL epidemics.After war exploded in South Sudan in 1983, approximately one third of the Western Upper Nile's population of 280,000 died of VL during a 10-year period [8].While conflict has long been known to trigger outbreaks of neglected tropical diseases, epidemics of VL are deemed to be the deadliest as conflict interferes with the provision of care for a fatal disease [5].Furthermore, human migration introduces VL to new locations outside those of known endemicity.This phenomenon is well documented among Ethiopian migrant laborers who descend from high-altitude Amhara areas to work on commercial farms on the Sudanese border [3].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS neglected tropical diseasesSame topicResearch on Leishmaniasis StudiesFrench-language works237,207