MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360613998 · doi:10.1061/9780784484708.001

2D and 3D Probabilistic Slope Stability Analysis of a Levee with Relief Wells

2023· article· en· W4360613998 on OpenAlexaff
Sina Javankhoshdel, Terence Ma, Brigid Cami, A.R. Azami, Thamer Yacoub

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsRocscience (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeveeGeotechnical engineeringGeologyGroundwaterPore water pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Relief wells are commonly used to reduce the pore water pressure on the river-side of levees which will eventually reduce the risk of levees and embankments failure. Two-dimensional slope stability analyses, which are commonly used, tend to smear the three-dimensional relief well water influence. Two-dimensional (2D) analyses assume that relief wells have infinite length normal to the 2D plane of the model. Three-dimensional (3D) analysis more accurately captures the seepage flow around the relief wells and considers the spacing effects of these wells on the overall groundwater analysis. This study considers a full 2D and 3D steady state finite element seepage analyses of a typical levee with different relief well setups. The pore water pressure distributions of these cases were used for 2D and 3D limit equilibrium analyses to find the slope factor of safety and probability of failure. A full comparison of the effect of relief wells is presented for the 2D and 3D models for cases with and without relief wells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207