MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360614128 · doi:10.1061/9780784484708.049

Numerical Study of Multi-Lane Surface Loading Effects on Corrugated Steel Culverts Buried in Shallow Cover Depth

2023· article· en· W4360614128 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elham Nakhostin, Shawn Kenny, S. Sivathayalan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCulvertThrustFinite element methodBending momentStructural engineeringNumerical analysisGeotechnical engineeringGeologyBendingMoment (physics)AxleEngineeringMathematicsMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mechanical response of corrugated steel culverts buried in shallow cover depth and subjected to service load conditions has been studied using finite element analysis (FEM) and the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CHBDC). The nature of the surface load critically influences the internal stresses and deformations and finite element analyses have been conducted to investigate the internal forces due to backfill and CL-625 Truckload for wheel and axle loading for 1-, 2-, and 3-lane configurations. The results of the numerical simulations are compared with the recommended internal forces in the CHBDC. The results indicate that the culvert experiences the maximum values of these responses at the crown. In the numerical simulation, multi-lane loading increases the thrust and bending moment magnitude, but this effect is not considered in the bending moment equations used based on the Canadian code. The results of normalized thrust indicate the considered increment in thrust responses due to the multi-lane loading is consistent and conservative relative to the FEM results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207