MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360615722 · doi:10.3390/su15075614

Chatbots in Education and Research: A Critical Examination of Ethical Implications and Solutions

2023· article· en· W4360615722 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainability · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineering ethicsPerspective (graphical)Field (mathematics)Exploratory researchInterpretation (philosophy)PhenomenonManagement scienceKnowledge managementSociologyComputer scienceData scienceEpistemologyEngineeringArtificial intelligenceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new era of education and research based on chatbots and artificial intelligence is quickly growing. However, the application of these new systems is associated with several challenges and limitations, mainly related to ethics. This paper explores the potential use of AI systems and chatbots in the academic field and their impact on research and education from an ethical perspective. Through a qualitative methodology, the researcher perform exploratory research and data collection based on expert analysis and interpretation. The researcher conducted a comprehensive review of the main potential challenges associated with the use of chatbots in education and research to identify current practices, challenges, and opportunities. This explorative work provides a foundational understanding of the studied topic. It also helps us to better understand the subjective experiences and perspectives of the observed phenomenon, and uncovers their meanings and proposes potential solutions to the observed issues. This study examines the advantages and limitations of AI systems and chatbots, as well as their role in supporting human expertise and judgment. The paper also discusses the ethical challenges related to the use of AI systems and chatbots in research, as well as the potential for misuse and exploitation. It also proposes effective solutions to the observed ethical dilemmas. The research admits that we live in a new era of AI-based education and research. The observed technological advancements will definitely shift research processes and transform educative systems, especially in term of assessments. Digital assessments are going to disappear and assessment methods need to be more creative and innovative. The paper highlights the necessity of adaptation to the new reality of AI systems and chatbots. Co-living, sustainability and continuous adaptation to the development of these systems will become a matter of emergency. Raising awareness, adopting appropriate legislations and solidifying ethical values will strengthen research and protect educational systems. The presence of AI systems and chatbots in education needs to be considered as an opportunity for development rather than a threat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.363
GPT teacher head0.580
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it