MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360616223 · doi:10.4000/rsh.1509

Transformation, transmission, affranchissement : les nouvelles pratiques agricoles à travers la bande dessinée (Davodeau, Lemardelé, de Francqueville)

2023· article· fr· W4360616223 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rachel Bouvet, Stéphanie Posthumus, Gabriel Tremblay‐Gaudette

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des Sciences Humaines · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformation (genetics)Biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article se penche sur la représentation dans la bande dessinée des nouvelles pratiques agricoles face à un monde en crise sur le plan écologique. Nous avons choisi d’examiner trois œuvres qui tentent de ré-imaginer le rapport à la terre, au champ et à l’agriculture : Les Ignorants (2011) d’Étienne Davodeau, Le Nouveau Monde paysan au Québec (2019) de Stéphane Lemardelé et Celle qui nous colle aux bottes (2021) de Marine de Francqueville. Si la révolution agricole, au lendemain de la seco...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des Sciences HumainesSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207