MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360616426 · doi:10.4000/coma.10444

Métisse blanche de Kim&#8239Lefèvre, ou la rémanence des images

2023· article· fr· W4360616426 on OpenAlexaff
Jack A. Yeager

Bibliographic record

VenueContinents manuscrits · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 1989, Kim Lefèvre publie sa célèbre autobiographie Métisse blanche qui relate les difficultés d’être une enfant métisse pendant la période de la colonisation française. Quelques années avant son décès en 2021, elle écrit un nouveau volet de son panorama autobiographique inspiré de la vie qu’elle a menée à Paris pendant les premiers mois de son arrivée en France en 1960. Elle appelle son manuscrit « Le territoire du père ». Ce texte inédit peut se lire en miroir avec Métisse blanche. Par rapport à l’autobiographie, il peut être considéré comme une révision des représentations de la culture française de la protagoniste. Il peut également être interprété comme une reprise enrichie du texte publié. Le manuscrit peut également être lu indépendamment, comme un texte du « choc culturel », un nouveau roman qui révèle le courage et l’indépendance de l’autrice face aux épreuves. L’étude de certains épisodes repris du texte publié et celle de deux versions d’un passage inédit concernant un séjour en Suisse nous permettront de discerner l’évolution sentimentale et stylistique de Kim Lefèvre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0950.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContinents manuscritsSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207