MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360616779 · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2023.103257

A satellite imagery smoke detection framework based on the Mahalanobis distance for early fire identification and positioning

2023· article· en· W4360616779 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire Detection and Safety Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmokeEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingPixelComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wildfires negatively affect the atmosphere and ecological environment. The rapid identification of smoke is helpful for early fire detection and positioning, which are significant for fire early warning, fire point tracing, and atmospheric environment monitoring. The purpose of this research is the establishment of a smoke detection framework with which to carry out smoke identification, concentration inversion and the extraction of the smoke concentration center to realize fire source identification and positioning. The spectral characteristics and variation pattern of smoke were first studied and analyzed based on a physical correlation model and laboratory experiments. Moreover, the spectral variation of the vegetation background was measured by the Mahalanobis distance (MD), and MD-based smoke identification and concentration inversion were carried out. Then, the extraction of the smoke concentration center and fire source positioning were realized based on the Laplace operator. Finally, the application and verification of the proposed method were carried out on spaceborne data of forest smoke in Daxing’anling, China, and British Columbia, Canada. The results show that: (1) At the significance level α = 0.1%, the overall accuracy of smoke recognition based on satellite images was 91.30%, and the Kappa coefficient was 81.69%. (2) The retrieved smoke concentration was in line with the visual interpretation results. (3) The fire point location error was 23.05 ± 4.14 m (less than 2 pixels). The results indicate that the proposed MD-based smoke detection model can effectively realize smoke pixel identification and concentration inversion. The proposed smoke concentration center identification method can accurately locate the fire source and provide positioning services to trace the source of wildfires in forest fire emergencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it